Sociology as a procedural science An introduction to understanding the meaning of the systematic practice of problematic presentation

Abstract

The process of placing sociology on the epistemology barometer and methodology together requires two main coordinates to understand the task of moving from what is societal to what is sociological for the academic researcher, the first of which is defined in the rule that: "sociology is questionable science"; The second shows in the rule that: "sociology is procedurally informed"; Perhaps the goal of what I am applying to the searching self has been to give great confusion to the interpretive end of the concept of boldness: is it linked to the proof of understanding within the daily reality of the social topic or is it limited to the presentation of a new reading emanating from an objective way of living observation? The depth of the debate that continues to arouse the urgency of today's societies' societies is not about the technical rigour of gathering the data of the topic under consideration. On the contrary, we seek it in the depth of the accountability exercised by the researcher, in order to understand the meaning of the systematic practice of problematic proposition, which refers, among other things, to field investigation rather than field verification.

Hence; We thought to dig into this case with an epistemomethodological perspective to try to dismantle the procedural meaning of the scientific problem in sociological field studies, following the following pivotal question:

-How do we understand sociology's procedure based on the problematic presentation of the topic?