أزمة الخطاب الفقهي الديني المعاصر في ظل الحداثة

Abstract

In every crisis that passes, the contemporary religious jurisprudential discourse emerges as part of the crisis and not part of the solution, and this is a recurring and tangible phenomenon, so that people have come to predict and expect what legal fatwas and statements might be like before they are issued, and this is the approach of official legitimate institutions, and sheikhs who enjoy good relations With the state, whatever this state is, their appreciation of the situation is in fact an imitation of the state’s position, then their role is limited to employing verses and hadiths in this direction, and the sheikh may be honest with himself and is not a hypocrite or a fool, he is either really confident in what he hears from the official media, or It is intended to enhance this confidence and to overlook some of the negatives in order to drive sedition and the greater corruption, but this trend by its nature will lead at least to the division of fatwas and religious discourses according to the division of countries, in addition to the weakness of confidence in this discourse, especially if matters are revealed and bitter results and consequences emerge