Unveiling Respondents’ Collaboration in Online Questionnaire Responses

Main Article Content

Ahlem CHELGHOUM

Abstract

In research, data collection and analysis are a challenging and stressful task. Researchers work hard to come up with reliable and accurate results using various tools. In the era of digital research methodologies, technology has offered a huge number of research instruments that facilitate the process of conducting quantitative studies. Online questionnaire, for instance, is one of the most popular data collection tools used in research, especially in the field of humanities. It has many advantages such as providing quick responses, being easily used, cost effective, and time saving. It can be used with large populations despite time and distance. However, the problem is that many researchers encounter problems in gathering data as some respondents ignore filling in the questionnaires. The majority of researchers share their online questionnaires on social media or through professional emails, where a large community of informants exists and fits many requirements. Nevertheless, the frequency of responses sometimes is not satisfying, which hinders the researchers’ study and analysis. Therefore, they end up using fewer representative samples or use other research instruments as a backup. The current paper attempts to delve deeper in this area and examine the possible reasons of the informants’ reluctance to fill in online questionnaires by means of an interview, as the most appropriate research tool in this context. In other terms, understanding the collaborative nature of respondent engagement in online questionnaires is paramount to uncover the factors influencing their willingness to collaborate. This paper also aims to suggest some recommendations to create good online questionnaires in order to raise the frequency of responses and enhance the effectiveness and validity of online questionnaire studies. 

Article Details

How to Cite
CHELGHOUM, A. (2024). Unveiling Respondents’ Collaboration in Online Questionnaire Responses. ALTRALANG Journal, 6(2), 377-388. https://doi.org/10.52919/altralang.v6i2.496
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Ahlem CHELGHOUM, Higher National School of Biotechnology, Taoufik Khaznadar, Algeria

Dr. Ahlem Chelghoum, with a PhD in Applied Linguistics and Language Studies, is an Associate Professor focusing on English for Specific Purposes (ESP) in the field of Biotechnology. She also serves as the Deputy Director for Information and Communication Systems and Foreign Relations at the Higher National School of Biotechnology. Her research interests are in Brain-Based Education, Digital Learning Platforms, Translation Technologies, and more, with a notable presence in various conferences and publications.

References

• Beck, B. (2023, November 27). Head-to-Head Review: Google Forms vs. SurveyMonkey vs. Typeform. Retrieved Mars 30, 2024, from ClearVoice: https://www.clearvoice.com/resources/google-forms-vs-surveymonkey-vs-typeform/
• Bhat, A. (2022). Data Collection: Definition, Methods, Example and Design. Retrieved January 18, 2022, from Question Pro: https://www.questionpro.com/blog/data-collection/
• Chenicheri, S. N., Adams, P., & Mertova, P. (2008). Student Engagement: The Key to Improving Survey Response Rate. Quality in Higher Education , 14 (3), 225-232.
• Díaz de Rada, V. (2022). Strategies to improve response rates to online surveys. Papers , 4 (107), 1-27.
• Farmer, R., Oakman, P., & Rice, P. (2016). A review of free online survey tools for undergraduate students. MSOR Connections , 15 (1), 71-78.
• Gillham, B. (2007). Developing a Questionnaire (2nd ed.). London/NEw York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
• Harlow, A. (2010). Online Surveys–Possibilities, Pitfalls and Practicalities: The Experience of the TELA Evaluation. Waikato Journal of Education , 15 (2), 95-108.
• Helen, B. (2019). About Research: Conducting Online Surveys. Journal of Human Lactation , 35 (3), 413-417.
• Lefever, S., Dal, M., & Matthíasdóttir, Á. (2007). Online data collection in academic research: advantages and limitations. British Journal of Educational Technology , 38 (4), 574–582.
• Mathers, N., Fox, N., & Hunn, A. (2007). Surveys and Questionnaires. Yorkshire & the Humber: The NIHR RDS for the East.
• Mertler, C. (2002). Demonstrating the Potential for Web-based Survey Methodology with a Case Study. American Secondary Education , 30 (2), 49-62.
• Minnaar, L., & Heystek, J. (2013). Online surveys as data collection instruments in education research: A feasible option. SAJHE , 27 (1), 162–183.
• Mulder, J., & Bruijne, M. d. (2019). Willingness of Online Respondents to Participate in Alternative Modes of data collection. Survey Practice , 12 (1), 1-11.
• Nagalakhmi, L. a., & Trivedi, M. J. (2015). Utilization of online survey tools for academic research: A practical approach to survey monkey. Research Journal of Science & IT Management , 4 (3), 21-28.
• Nayak, M. S., & Narayan, K. A. (2019). Strengths and Weakness of Online Surveys. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (IOSR-JHSS) , 24 (5), 31-38.
• Pozzo, M. I., Borgobello, A., & Pierella, M. P. (2019). Using questionnaires in research on universities: analysis of experiences from a situated perspective. REIRE Revista d’Innovació i Recerca en Educació , 12 (2), 1–16.
• Revilla, M., & Höhne, J. K. (2020). How long do respondents think online surveys should be? New evidence from two online panels in Germany. International Journal of Market Research , 0 (0), 1-18.
• Rubin, R. (2019, June 8). The Best Online Survey Tools. Retrieved Mars 30, 2023, from PCMag: https://www.pcmag.com/picks/the-best-online-survey-tools
• Saleh, A., & Bista, K. (2017). Examining Factors Impacting Online Survey Response Rates in Educational Research: Perceptions of Graduate Students. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation , 13 (29), 63-74.
• Salvatori, H. (2023, July 5). Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Surveys. Retrieved March 30, 2023, from Cvent: https://www.cvent.com/en/blog/events/advantages-disadvantages-online-surveys
• Vasantha Raju N, N., & Harinarayana, N. S. (2016). Online survey tools: A case study of Google Forms. Paper presented at the National Conference on Scientific, Computational & Information Research Trends in Engineering. Mysore.: GSSS-IETW.
• Wu, M.-J., Zhao, K., & Fils-Aime, F. (2022). Response rates of online surveys in published research: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior Reports , 7, 1-11.