A sociological Approach to the Concept of Authority (Power)

Main Article Content

Keltoum Berani

Abstract

The concept of authority, power, has several intellectual references, linked to the various transformations through which the general system moves outside and within society, and where the legitimacy of authority is debated, through different directions in its theses, even though it aims for a common political goal, aspiring to compete for strategic positions in Decision making. Perhaps this, i.e. these disparate references, is what may create the most important active factors in the political imbalance of societies, and thus is what establishes the interpretation of the concept of power in its relationship to various cultural variables, through sociological readings.


The sociological vision of the concept of power does not deviate from the inductive reading of the reality of human society in its time and place. It is an extension of the anthropological reading, and a non-chronological theoretical complement between the two readings. The definitions that the sociological vision adopts, in our approach, are, in most of its intellectual references, the same. Modern sources (pioneers of modern thought) present a problematic dimension to the concept of authority, rather than a comprehensive, comprehensive definition.

Article Details

How to Cite
Berani, K. (2024). A sociological Approach to the Concept of Authority (Power). Social and Human Science Studies, 13(02), 147 - 156. https://doi.org/10.46315/1714-013-002-012
Section
Articles

References

1. برتراند راسل، 1961، السلطة والفرد، ترجمة شاهر الحمود، بيروت ، دار الطليعة
2. ثروت بدوي، 1975، النظام السياسي، القاهرة، دار النهضة العربية،
3. حوار مع بورديو، 1985، مركز الانماء القومي، العدد 37 ديسمبر
4. فريدريك إنجلز، ترجمة وجدي حمدي ، (2004)، حول السلطة، ، إعداد رقمي،
1. D. Easton, (1974) Le système politique, traduction Pierre Racheron, Ed : A. Colin, Paris
2. Houari Addi, 1990, L’Etat et pouvoir, approche méthodologique et sociologique, OPU, Algérie
3. J.W. Lapierre,( 1969)Le pouvoir politique, « Le pouvoir social immédiat, le pouvoir social individualisé, le pouvoir social institutionnalisé » « loi des trois états » France
4. M. Foucault,( 1994 ), La volonté de savoir, Gallimard
5. M. Crozier (1964), , Pouvoir et Organisation, Archives Européennes de Sociologie Vol 5 n° 1
6. M. Crozier. & E. Friedberg, (1977) L'acteur et le système, Éditions, Paris, Seuil
7. L.Althusse, (1970), Idéologie et appareils idéologiques d’État. (Notes pour une recherche)”.
8. Lasswell Harold D) 1952)( L' « Analyse du contenu » et le langage de la politique. In: Revue française de science politique, 2e année, n°3,
9. Pierre Bourdieu, (2001), Langage et pouvoir symbolique, Ed : point Paris, Seuil, Lasswell Harold D. 1952, L' « Analyse du contenu » et le langage de la politique. In: Revue française de science politique, 2e année, n°3,
10. Philipe Braud, 2000, Sociologie politique, Paris LGD
11. R. Aron, (1962), Paix et guerre entre les nations, Paris, dans Persée, http://www.persée.fr