Public Birth Rethinking Freedom of Action in the Philosophy of Hannah Arendt

Main Article Content

Safia Menad

Abstract

Hannah Arendt is considered one of the most prominent political philosophers of the twentieth century and her intellectual project was characterized by the search for a new horizon for freedom and human action outside the traditional models of political philosophy. Amidst debates about power, freedom, and totalitarian modernity, Arendt introduced a new concept into the field of political philosophy: “natality” She considered the human being not only a rational or speaking being, but primarily a born being. This definition refers not only to biological origin, but also to the human being’s capacity for beginning. From this perspective, natality becomes the foundation of freedom and the key to understanding political action understood as the capacity to bring something new into the world ,


This article will analyze the concept of unity in Hannah Arendt’s philosophy by tracing its connection to the concepts of action, freedom, plurality, and the public sphere. It will demonstrate how Arendt was able to rethink politics starting from this philosophical-ontological understanding, and how she presented it as a response to the challenges posed by political modernity, particularly in the context of totalitarianism.

Article Details

How to Cite
Menad , S. (2026). Public Birth. Social and Human Science Studies, 15(02), 99 - 114. https://doi.org/10.46315/1714-015-002-008
Section
Articles

References

_آرنت، حنّة. (2016). في الثورة (ترجمة عبد الغفار مكاوي). القاهرة: دار التنوير.
_آرنت، حنّة. (2017). الشرط الإنساني (ترجمة جورج كتورة). بيروت: المنظمة العربية للترجمة.
_آرنت، حنّة. (2020). أسس التوتاليتارية (ترجمة فلاح رحيم). بيروت: دار الرافدين.
_آرنت، حنّة. (2020). أزمة الجمهورية (ترجمة فلاح رحيم). بيروت: دار الرافدين.
_أيفانهوف، أومرآم ميخائيل. (1990). القالب الروحاني ومستقبل الإنسانية (ترجمة مركز بروفيس). بيروت: دار الأفق الجديد.
_هايدغر، مارتن. (2008). الوجود والزمان (ترجمة وتقديم فتحي المسكيني). بيروت: دار الفارابي
_Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
_Arendt, H. (1963). On Revolution. New York: Viking Press.
_Arendt, H. (1998). The Human Condition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
_Arendt, H. (2006). Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought. New York: Penguin Books.
_Arendt, H. (2007). La vie de l’esprit. Paris: Quadrige.
_Arendt, H. (2015). Crisis de la República (G. Solana Alonso, Trans.). Madrid: Editorial Trotta.
_Arendt, H. (1991). Juger: Sur la philosophie politique de Kant. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
_Augustine. (1991). Confessions (H. Chadwick, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published ca. 400)
_Beiner, R. (2001). Hannah Arendt et la faculté de juger. In Juger, pp. 132–135.
_Bérubé, S. (2015). Au-delà de la "mésentente" : La politique chez Jacques Rancière et Hannah Arendt (Master’s thesis, Université d’Ottawa), pp. 23–25, 82–86.
_Galindo Lara, B., & Gallegos, C. (2015). Arendt contra Sartre: Revolución, diálogo o conflicto. Madrid: Plaza y Valdés.
_Marcel, G. (1949). Être et Avoir. Paris: Aubier-Montaigne.
_Nixon, R. (2020). Worldliness and natality in Hannah Arendt’s political thought. Political Theory Review, 16(1), 1–10.
_Peixoto, R. L., & Baggio, R. C. (2021). Autoridade e poder: Desde o Senado Romano até o controle constitucional nos Estados Unidos da América, conforme Hannah Arendt. Revista Brasileira de Teoria Constitucional, 7(2), 32–51.
_Rajaoson, J. (2020). De la banalité du mal chez Hannah Arendt. Les Pas Sages et Sans Destin, pp. 5–6.
_Schwarz, E. (2014). @hannah_arendt: An Arendtian critique of online social networks. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 43(1), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829814541505
_Schwarz, O. (2014). The political philosophy of Hannah Arendt: Freedom, action, and the public sphere. Contemporary Political Theory, 13(2), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2013.21
_Stewart, M. (2022). Embodied natality: The political body in Arendt’s thought. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 48(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537211052140