Teachers’ Classroom Interactional Competence: An Analysis in Micro-Contexts of Teacher-Class Interaction

Main Article Content

Asma AZIZ
Samira ARAR

Abstract

Creating learning opportunities depends to a greater extent on classroom interaction, in which learning is maximised when teachers demonstrate classroom interactional competence (CIC). This article investigates how EFL Algerian teachers manifest CIC in the co-construction of talk-in- interaction. It addresses three core objectives: firstly, it examines teachers' use of mode-convergent language. Secondly, it analyses the interactional resources deployed by teachers to manage creating interactional space. Finally, it identifies the ways teachers shape their learners’ contributions. A qualitative research was adopted, and the data were collected through the use of video-recording and field notes at a private language institute in Sétif, Algeria. The findings revealed that teachers manifested CIC in different classroom micro-contexts but failed, in many occasions, to use mode-convergent language and to provide interactional space in the “Classroom Context” mode. To shape learners’ contributions, the findings uncovered the use of a range of interactional resources. However, differing from previous studies, the findings unveiled the use of humour as a resource that stimulated students’ further engagement in the discourse. Implications to teacher education are discussed as well. 

Article Details

How to Cite
AZIZ, A., & ARAR, S. (2024). Teachers’ Classroom Interactional Competence: An Analysis in Micro-Contexts of Teacher-Class Interaction. ALTRALANG Journal, 6(1), 330-348. https://doi.org/10.52919/altralang.v6i1.430
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Asma AZIZ, University of Algiers 2 Abou EL Kacem Saâdallah, Algeria

Asma AZIZ is an assistant lecturer of applied linguistics and teaching languages at Setif2 University, Algeria and a PhD student at Algiers2 University. Her research focuses on improving teachers’ talk-in-interaction through reflection. She has a particular interest in classroom discourse and interaction as well as reflective practice and teacher development.

Samira ARAR, University of Algiers 2 Abou EL Kacem Saâdallah, Algeria

Samira ARAR is a full professor at Algiers 2 University, Algeria. She is specialized in Applied Linguistics and TEFL. Her fields of interest include EFL teaching and learning strategies, blended learning instruction, meta-cognition and self-regulated learning, special needs education, educational psychology, and ESP.

References

• Allwright, R.L &Bailey, K. (1991). Focus on the Language Classroom: An Introduction to Classroom Research for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• aus der Wieschen, M. V. (2015). Review of Social Interaction and L2 Classroom Discourse. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 103-110.
• Cancino, M. (2017). Shaping learner contributions in the EFL language classroom: A conversation analytic perspective. Lenguas Modernas, 49(Primer Semastre), 53-76.
• Can Daşkın, N. (2015). Shaping learner contributions in an EFL classroom: Implication for L2 classroom interactional competence. Classroom Discourse, 6(1), 33-56.
• Clifton, J.(2006). Facilitator Talk. ELT Journal,60(2), 142-150.
• Cullens, R.( 1996). The Use of Lesson Transcripts for Developing Teachers’Classroom Language. In H. Trappex-Lomax and G.Ferguson (Eds.), Language in Language Teacher Education. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co
• Creswell,J.W.( 2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design : choosing among five approaches(3rd ed.). Thousand oaks, CA: Sage.
• Dine, R & Menezla, N. ( 2019). A Qualitative Study of Classroom Interactional Competence among University Teachers. Journal of Psychological and Educational Sciences. Algeria: El Oued University. 5(4), 268-281.
• Ellis, R.(1998) ‘Discourse control and the acquisition-rich classroom’, in W.A. Renandya and G.M . Jacobs (eds) Learners and Language Learning, Anthology Series 39, Singapore: SEAM O Regional Language Centre.
• Ellis,R. (2000) ‘Task-based research and language pedagogy’, Language Teaching Research, 49: 193–220.
• Escobar Urmeneta, C. & Walsh, S. (2017). Classroom interactional competence in content and language integrated learning. In: A, Llinares & T, Morton (Eds.). Applied Linguistics Perspectives on CLIL. Amsterdam (Holland): John Benjamins. pp. 189-206
• Gibbons, P. (2007). Mediating Academic Language Learning Through Classroom Discourse. In J. Cummins & C.Davison (Eds.), International Handbook of English Language Teaching. Springer Science+business media. pp. 701-718
• Girgin, U & Brandt, A. (2019): Creating space for learning through‘Mm hm’ in a L2 classroom: Implications for L2 classroom interactional competence, Classroom Discourse, DOI: 10.1080/19463014.2019.1603115
• Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Oxford, England: Polity Press.
• Kramsch, C. (1986) ‘From language proficiency to interactional competence’, The Modern Language Journal, 70 (4): 366–372.
• Lantolf, J.P. (2000) Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Long, M .H. (1983) ‘Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of meaning’, Applied Linguistics, 4: 126–141.
• McCarthy, M .J. (2005) ‘Fluency and confluence: What fluent speakers do’, The Language Teacher, 29(6): 26–28.
• Lauderdale,J & Phillippi, J. (2018). A Guide to Field Notes for Qualitative Research: Context and Conversation. Qualitative Health Research, 28(3): 381-388.
• Rymes, B. (2008). Classroom Discourse Analysis : A Tool for Critical Reflection. Cresskill NJ: Hampton Press.
• Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
• Seedhouse, P. (2005).Conversation Analysis and language learning.. Language Teaching, 38(04), 165-187.
• Sert, O. (2015). Social Interaction and L2 Classroom Discourse. Edinburgh, England: Edinburgh University Press.
• Supakorn, S. (2020. A Conversation Analytic Study of Classroom Interactional Competence. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network Journal, 13(2), 15-40
• Thornbury, S. (1996) ‘Teachers research teacher talk’, English Language Teaching Journal, 50: 279–289.
• Van Lier, L. (1996) Interaction in the Language Curriculum: awareness, autonomy and authenticity, New York: Longman.
• Walsh, S. (2002). Construction or obstruction: Teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 6(1), 3–23.
• Walsh, S. (2006) Investigating classroom discourse. London, England: Routledge.
• Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. London, England: Routledge.
• Walsh, S. (2012). Conceptualising classroom interactional competence. Novitas-ROYAL Research on Youth and Language), 6(1), 1–14.
• Yaqubi, B., & Rokni, M. P. (2012). Teachers’ limited wait-time practice and learners’ participation opportunities in EFL classroom interaction. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 10, 127-160.
• Yataganbaba, E., & Yildirim, R. (2016). Teacher Interruptions and Limited Wait Time in EFL Young Learner Classrooms. Procedia-Social Behavioural Sciences, 232(1): 689-695