Teachers’ Classroom Interactional Competence: An Analysis in Micro-Contexts of Teacher-Class Interaction
Main Article Content
Abstract
Creating learning opportunities depends to a greater extent on classroom interaction, in which learning is maximised when teachers demonstrate classroom interactional competence (CIC). This article investigates how EFL Algerian teachers manifest CIC in the co-construction of talk-in- interaction. It addresses three core objectives: firstly, it examines teachers' use of mode-convergent language. Secondly, it analyses the interactional resources deployed by teachers to manage creating interactional space. Finally, it identifies the ways teachers shape their learners’ contributions. A qualitative research was adopted, and the data were collected through the use of video-recording and field notes at a private language institute in Sétif, Algeria. The findings revealed that teachers manifested CIC in different classroom micro-contexts but failed, in many occasions, to use mode-convergent language and to provide interactional space in the “Classroom Context” mode. To shape learners’ contributions, the findings uncovered the use of a range of interactional resources. However, differing from previous studies, the findings unveiled the use of humour as a resource that stimulated students’ further engagement in the discourse. Implications to teacher education are discussed as well.
Article Details
All authors published in ALTRALANG Journal retain the copyright to their work and grant ALTRALANG Journal the right of first publication. Simultaneously, the work is licensed under an open-access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license meaning that anyone may download and read the article for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted, provided that the original published version is cited. Such terms facilitate extensive utilisation and visibility of the scholarly output while guaranteeing due recognition to the authors.
Authors sign a Copyright Agreement Form to provide the copyrights to ALTRALANG Journal needed to publish and disseminate the article in current and future formats, including migrating journals to new platforms and preserving journal content.
PROTECTING AUTHOR RIGHTS: Copyright aims to protect the specific way the article has been written to describe an experiment and the results. ALTRALANG Journal is committed to its authors to protect and defend their work and their reputation and takes allegations of infringement, plagiarism, ethic disputes, and fraud very seriously.
LICENSE: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license
References
• aus der Wieschen, M. V. (2015). Review of Social Interaction and L2 Classroom Discourse. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 103-110.
• Cancino, M. (2017). Shaping learner contributions in the EFL language classroom: A conversation analytic perspective. Lenguas Modernas, 49(Primer Semastre), 53-76.
• Can Daşkın, N. (2015). Shaping learner contributions in an EFL classroom: Implication for L2 classroom interactional competence. Classroom Discourse, 6(1), 33-56.
• Clifton, J.(2006). Facilitator Talk. ELT Journal,60(2), 142-150.
• Cullens, R.( 1996). The Use of Lesson Transcripts for Developing Teachers’Classroom Language. In H. Trappex-Lomax and G.Ferguson (Eds.), Language in Language Teacher Education. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co
• Creswell,J.W.( 2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design : choosing among five approaches(3rd ed.). Thousand oaks, CA: Sage.
• Dine, R & Menezla, N. ( 2019). A Qualitative Study of Classroom Interactional Competence among University Teachers. Journal of Psychological and Educational Sciences. Algeria: El Oued University. 5(4), 268-281.
• Ellis, R.(1998) ‘Discourse control and the acquisition-rich classroom’, in W.A. Renandya and G.M . Jacobs (eds) Learners and Language Learning, Anthology Series 39, Singapore: SEAM O Regional Language Centre.
• Ellis,R. (2000) ‘Task-based research and language pedagogy’, Language Teaching Research, 49: 193–220.
• Escobar Urmeneta, C. & Walsh, S. (2017). Classroom interactional competence in content and language integrated learning. In: A, Llinares & T, Morton (Eds.). Applied Linguistics Perspectives on CLIL. Amsterdam (Holland): John Benjamins. pp. 189-206
• Gibbons, P. (2007). Mediating Academic Language Learning Through Classroom Discourse. In J. Cummins & C.Davison (Eds.), International Handbook of English Language Teaching. Springer Science+business media. pp. 701-718
• Girgin, U & Brandt, A. (2019): Creating space for learning through‘Mm hm’ in a L2 classroom: Implications for L2 classroom interactional competence, Classroom Discourse, DOI: 10.1080/19463014.2019.1603115
• Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Oxford, England: Polity Press.
• Kramsch, C. (1986) ‘From language proficiency to interactional competence’, The Modern Language Journal, 70 (4): 366–372.
• Lantolf, J.P. (2000) Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Long, M .H. (1983) ‘Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of meaning’, Applied Linguistics, 4: 126–141.
• McCarthy, M .J. (2005) ‘Fluency and confluence: What fluent speakers do’, The Language Teacher, 29(6): 26–28.
• Lauderdale,J & Phillippi, J. (2018). A Guide to Field Notes for Qualitative Research: Context and Conversation. Qualitative Health Research, 28(3): 381-388.
• Rymes, B. (2008). Classroom Discourse Analysis : A Tool for Critical Reflection. Cresskill NJ: Hampton Press.
• Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
• Seedhouse, P. (2005).Conversation Analysis and language learning.. Language Teaching, 38(04), 165-187.
• Sert, O. (2015). Social Interaction and L2 Classroom Discourse. Edinburgh, England: Edinburgh University Press.
• Supakorn, S. (2020. A Conversation Analytic Study of Classroom Interactional Competence. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network Journal, 13(2), 15-40
• Thornbury, S. (1996) ‘Teachers research teacher talk’, English Language Teaching Journal, 50: 279–289.
• Van Lier, L. (1996) Interaction in the Language Curriculum: awareness, autonomy and authenticity, New York: Longman.
• Walsh, S. (2002). Construction or obstruction: Teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 6(1), 3–23.
• Walsh, S. (2006) Investigating classroom discourse. London, England: Routledge.
• Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. London, England: Routledge.
• Walsh, S. (2012). Conceptualising classroom interactional competence. Novitas-ROYAL Research on Youth and Language), 6(1), 1–14.
• Yaqubi, B., & Rokni, M. P. (2012). Teachers’ limited wait-time practice and learners’ participation opportunities in EFL classroom interaction. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 10, 127-160.
• Yataganbaba, E., & Yildirim, R. (2016). Teacher Interruptions and Limited Wait Time in EFL Young Learner Classrooms. Procedia-Social Behavioural Sciences, 232(1): 689-695