Questioning the Democratic Legitimacy of the Brexit Referendum 2016

Article Sidebar

altralangvol6issue1
PDF
Published: Jun 30, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52919/altralang.v6i1.435
Keywords:
Brexit, Common-good, Deliberative Democracy, Democratic Legitimacy, Referendums

Main Article Content

Rouza ESSEGHIER
University of Mostaganem Abdelhamid Ibn Badis, Algeria
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8685-5522
Houari MIRED
University of Mostaganem Abdelhamid Ibn Badis, Algeria
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9206-640X

Abstract

In light of the substantial shift toward popular decision-making mechanisms in Western European polities, a comprehensive analysis is imperative to evaluate the democratic legitimacy of these devices, with particular emphasis on referendums. These instruments entrust voters with the resolutions of significant constitutional matters that their political leaders have been unable to address. The present research centres upon the 2016 EU referendum in Britain as a case study, given its criticism for lacking a genuine democratic process and being subject to particular media agenda. The research methodology predominantly adopts a qualitative approach, with the analysis structured around the theoretical framework of deliberative democracy. Various deliberative elements, such as the distribution of information and media coverage throughout the entire process, form the basis of the analysis. While the ideal envisioned by this deliberative theory is the attainment of well-discussed and informed decisions reflective of the citizens’ common good, the findings of the analysis revealed a contrary outcome.

Article Details

How to Cite
ESSEGHIER, R., & MIRED, H. (2024). Questioning the Democratic Legitimacy of the Brexit Referendum 2016. ALTRALANG Journal, 6(1), 375-387. https://doi.org/10.52919/altralang.v6i1.435
Issue
Vol 6 No 1 (2024): ALTRALANG Journal Volume: 6 Issue: 1 / June 2024
Section
Articles

All authors published in ALTRALANG Journal retain the copyright to their work and grant ALTRALANG Journal the right of first publication. Simultaneously, the work is licensed under an open-access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license meaning that anyone may download and read the article for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted, provided that the original published version is cited. Such terms facilitate extensive utilisation and visibility of the scholarly output while guaranteeing due recognition to the authors.

Authors sign a Copyright Agreement Form to provide the copyrights to ALTRALANG Journal needed to publish and disseminate the article in current and future formats, including migrating journals to new platforms and preserving journal content.

PROTECTING AUTHOR RIGHTS: Copyright aims to protect the specific way the article has been written to describe an experiment and the results. ALTRALANG Journal is committed to its authors to protect and defend their work and their reputation and takes allegations of infringement, plagiarism, ethic disputes, and fraud very seriously.

LICENSE:  This work is licensed under a  Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license

Author Biographies

Rouza ESSEGHIER, University of Mostaganem Abdelhamid Ibn Badis, Algeria

ESSEGHIER Rouza: I am currently pursuing a PhD at Abdelhamid Ibn Badis University of Mostaganem, building upon my foundational academic background with a Master’s degree in British Civilization. My doctoral studies are focused on Contemporary British Studies, a field that allows for in-depth exploration of various dimensions of British society. As an active member of the DSPM research laboratory, my area of research encompasses a broad spectrum of British studies, with particular emphasis on the interconnected realms of British culture, history, literature, and politics. I have worked as a part-time teacher at Abdelhamid Ibn Badis University of Mostaganem for several years. Additionally, I have participated in numerous academic events, including conferences and study days, which focus on literature and civilization. 

Houari MIRED, University of Mostaganem Abdelhamid Ibn Badis, Algeria

MIRED Houari: Prof. Mired is a Senior Lecturer in British politics and Society at Abdelhamid Ibn Badis University of Mostaganem. He is interested in twentieth-century British political and social history. Active member in SACER research Laboratory

References

• Alabrese, E., Becker, S. O., Fetzer, T., & Novy, D. (2019a). Who voted for Brexit? individual and regional data combined. European Journal of Political Economy, 56, 132–150.
• Benhabib, S., (1994). Deliberative rationality and models of democratic legitimacy. Constellation, 1 (1): 26-52.
• Bossetta, M., Dutceac, A., Segesten., & Hans-Jörg Trenz (2017). Political participation on Facebook during brexit, Journal of Language and Politics, 17 (2): 173–194.
• Centre for Research in Communication and Culture, Media coverage of the EU Referendum (report 5), Loughborough University, (2016).
• Chambers, S. (2003). Deliberative Democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 6 (1): 307–326.
• Chambers, S. (2018). Making referendums safe for democracy: A call for more and better deliberation. Swiss Political Science Review, 24(3), 305–311.
• Cohen, J. (1997). Procedure and substance in deliberative democracy. In James Bohman and William Rehg (Eds). Deliberative democracy: essays on reason and politics (pp.407-437). Cambridge, MA: MIR Press.
• Courant, D. (2021). Citizens’ Assemblies for referendums and constitutional reforms: Is there an “Irish model” for deliberative democracy? Frontiers in Political Science, 2.
• Curtice, J. (2018). The Emotional Legacy of Brexit: how Britain has become a country of 'Remainers' and 'Leavers'. Nat Cent.
• El-Wakil, A. (2020). Supporting Deliberative Systems with Referendums and Initiatives. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 16(1), pp. 37–45.
• Fox, S. & Pearce, S. (2016). Survey evidence: The EU referendum had a clear positive impact on young people’s political engagement. LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) Blog (26 Aug 2016).
• Fox, S. (2020). Political alienation and referendums: How political alienation was related to support for Brexit. British Politics, 16 (1): 16-35.
• Gherghina, S. & O’Malley, D. (2019). Self-determination during the Brexit campaign: Comparing leave and remain messages. Fédéralisme Régionalisme. Retrieved March 4, 2022, from https://popups.uliege.be/1374-3864/index.php?id=1895
• Hendriks, F., & Wagenaar, C. (2023). The Deliberative Referendum: An Idea Whose Time has Come? Administration & Society, 55(3), 569-590.
• Hobolt, S., Leeper, T. & Tilley, J. (2018). ‘Emerging Brexit Identities’, Menon, A. (Ed.), Brexit and Public Opinion, London: The UK in a Changing Europe. https://ukandeu.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Public-Opinion.pdf
• Howard, P. & Kollanyi, B. (2016), “Bots, #StrongerIn, and #Brexit: Computational Propaganda during the UK-EU Referendum” COMPROP Research Note. 2016.
• Landmore, H. (2018). Referendums Are Never Merely Referendums: On the Need to Make Popular Vote Processes More Deliberative. Swiss Political Science Review, 24(3): 320–327.
• LeDuc, L. (2015). Referendums and deliberative democracy. Electoral Studies, 38, 139-148.
• McKay, S. (2019). Building a better referendum: Linking mini-publics and mass publics in popular votes. Regular Issue, 15(1).
• Mutz, D. (2008). Is deliberative democracy a falsifiable theory? Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1): 521-538.
• Parkinson, J. (2020). The roles of referendums in deliberative systems. Journal of representative democracy,56(4), 485-500.
• Polonski, V. (2016). Impact of social media on the outcome of the EU referendum. Jackson, Daniel, et.al. (Ed.) EU Referendum Analysis 2016: Media, Voters and the Campaign. The center for the study of journalism, culture and community, 2016, Poole.
• Rasmussen, D. (2019). Ideal Speech Situation. In A. Allen, & E. Mendieta, The Cambridge Habermas Lexicon (p. 851). Cambridge University Press.
• Riviére- De Franco, K. (2017). Le référendum sur l’Union Européenne: une crise identitaire pour la presse Britannique? Revue française de civilisation britannique, XXII (2).
• The Conservative Party Manifesto 2015. (n.d.-a). https://www.theresavilliers.co.uk/sites/www.theresavilliers.co.uk/files/conservativemanifesto2015.pdf
• The Electoral Commission, The 2016 EU referendum: Report on the 23 June 2016 referendum on the UK’s membership of the European Union (2016).
• Zappettini, F. (2019). The Brexit referendum: how trade and immigration in the discourses of the official campaigns have legitimised a toxic (inter) national logic. Critical Discourse Studies, 16 (4): 403-419.