Discourse as an Essentially Contested Concept in Media Studies: From the Correct Use to the Abstract Concept
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The issue of concepts formation has always been at the centre of debate among scholars in media and communication studies. This paper is an attempt to introduce the general principles of Gallie's essentially contested concepts in the light of the widespread use of concept misunderstanding in this field of research where discourse is of central importance to researchers. We argue that the present essay explores primarily the option of placing more attention on theorizing rather than on theory. Accordingly, this article does seek to address the concepts of discourse in the established schools of discourse analysis within Gallie's framework aiming at settling the conflict over discourse by constructing epistemological bridge with Sartori's ladder of abstraction to overcome the problem of essential contestedness in media and communication studies.
Article Details
All authors published in ALTRALANG Journal retain the copyright to their work and grant ALTRALANG Journal the right of first publication. Simultaneously, the work is licensed under an open-access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license meaning that anyone may download and read the article for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted, provided that the original published version is cited. Such terms facilitate extensive utilisation and visibility of the scholarly output while guaranteeing due recognition to the authors.
Authors sign a Copyright Agreement Form to provide the copyrights to ALTRALANG Journal needed to publish and disseminate the article in current and future formats, including migrating journals to new platforms and preserving journal content.
PROTECTING AUTHOR RIGHTS: Copyright aims to protect the specific way the article has been written to describe an experiment and the results. ALTRALANG Journal is committed to its authors to protect and defend their work and their reputation and takes allegations of infringement, plagiarism, ethic disputes, and fraud very seriously.
LICENSE: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license
1.png)
References
• Barry, A. (1979). Eccentrically contested concepts. British Journal of Political Science, 9 (1), 122-126.
• Besson, S. (2004).Sovereignty in conflict. In S. Tierney & C.Warbrick (eds.). Towards an "lnternational legal community" ? The sovereignty of states and the sovereignty of international law . British Institute of International and Comparative Law.(pp.131 -199).
• Charaudeau, P . (2009B). Dis-mois quel est ton corpus, je te dirais quelle est ta problématique .Corpus. N°8. 37-66.https://journals.openedition.org/corpus/1674>.
• Charaudeau, P .(1995A). Une analyse sémiolinguistique du discours. Revue Langages. N°117.http://www.patrick-charaudeau.com/Une-analyse-semiolinguistique-du,64.html
• Collier, D. H., Fernando. D., & Maciuceanu, A.O .(2006). Essentially contested concepts: Debates and applications. Journals of Political Ideologies, 11 (3). 211-246.
• Collier,D.,Mahon,E.J.(1993). Conceptual « stretching » revisited: Adapting categories in comparative analysis. The American Political Science Review.87 (4). 845-855.
• Connolly,W . (1993). The terms of political discourse (3rd ed.). Princeton University Press
• Davallon, J .(2004).Objet concret, object scientifique, object de recherche. Revue Hermès. N°38. France : C.N.R.S Edition.30-37.
• Freeden, M. (2004). Editorial: Essential contestability and effective contestability. Journal of Political Ideologies. 9(1). 3-11.
• Gallie, W. B. (1956A). Essentially contested concepts. Meeting of the Aristotelian society at 21. London, W.C.1 . 167-198.
• Gallie, W.B .(1956B).Art as an essentially contested concept. Philosophical Quartely.6(23). Oxford University Press. 97-114.
• Gee, J.P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and methods (4th ed.). London: Routledge .
• Gerring, J .(1999).What makes a concept good? A critical framework for understanding concept formation in the social sciences. Polity . 31(3). 357-393.
• Gray, J.(1977).On the contestability of social and political concepts. Poltical Theory. N°5. 331-349.
• Keller, R. (2012).Entering discourses: Agenda for qualitative research and sociology of knowledge. Qualitative Sociology Review. III (2).46-75.
• Kenneth, S. (2002).Mutually contested concepts and their standard general use. Journal of Classical Sociology.2 (3). 329-343.
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2019). Hégémonie et stratégie socialiste: Vers une radicalisation de la démocratie. Paris: Fayard/Pluriel.
• Langer, R. (1997). The concept of discourse in the analysis of complex communication events. Copenhagen Business School. Working Paper/Intercultural communication and management.https://researchapi.cbs.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/59176258/wpnr.26_1997.pdf>
• Maingueneau, D. (1979A). Initiation aux méthodes de l'analyse des discours. France: Hachette Université.
• Maingueneau, D. (2012B). Que cherchent les analystes du discours ?. Argumentation et analyse du discours. Revue électronique du groupe ADAAR. https://journals.openedition.org/aad/1354
• Mair, P. (2008). Concepts and concepts formation. In D. Della Porta & M.Keating (Eds.), Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: A pluralist perspective (pp.177-196). NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Pennanen, J. (2021). Essentially contested concepts: Gallie’s thesis and its aftermath. Finland. [PhD thesis, University of Jyväskylä] .https://jyx.jyu.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/77373/1/978-951-39-8802-9_vaitos03092021.pdf
• Sartori,G.(1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. The American Political Science Review. LXIV (4). 1033-1053.
• Swedberg, R.(2012).Theorizing in sociology and social science: Turning to the context of discovery. Theory and Society. N°.41.1-40. http://people.soc.cornell.edu/swedberg/Theorizing%20in%20Sociology%20and%20Social%20Science.pdf
• Weber, M. (1949). The methodology of the social sciences. E.Shills & H.Finch. NY: Free Press