The Resurgence of Religion between The Peter Berger’s “Desecularization” and The Habermasian “Post-secularism”.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper attempts to trace the interactive relationship, that has arisen throughout history between religion and secularism, by presenting the narratives of secularization about the neutralization of religion from the public sphere, and its prediction of the decline of religion, even from the private sphere in societies undergoing the modernization process, we will also address the resurgence of religion and present the two most significant theses in philosophy and Sociology (The Desecularization of the world by Peter Berger, and Post-secularism by Jürgen Habermas), which discuss secularism’s incorrect prediction regarding the decline of religion, and the nature of the religion resurgence within the secularized social sphere, from two different perspectives.
Article Details
Copyright Notice
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal[cite: 2, 11].
The journal allows authors to deposit the Version of Record (published version) in an institutional or other repository of their choice without any embargo period.
References
Berger, P. (1968, February 25). A Bleak Outlook Is Seen for Religion. Retrieved January 05, 2021, from The New York Times Archives: https://www.nytimes.com/1968/02/25/archives/a-bleak-outlook-is-seen-for-religion.html
Berger, P. (1999). The Desecularization of the world a Global Overview. In P. Berger, The Desecularization of the world Resurgent Religion and world politics (pp. 1-18). Washington: The Ethicd and Public Policy Center.
Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. Chicago, USA: The University of Chicago Press.
Habermas, J. (2008). Between Naturalism and Religion. (C. Cronin, Trans.) UK: Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (2008). QU'EST-CE QU'UNE SOCIÉTÉ « POST-SÉCULIÈRE » ? Le Débat , 5 (152), 4-15.
Muller, M. (1880). Lectures on The Origin and Growth of Religion. London: Longmans Green, and Co. Williams and norgate.
Schmaus, W. (1982). A Reappraisal of Comte's Three-State Law. History and Theory , 21 (2), 248-266.
Stark, R. (1999). Secularization, R.I.P. Sociology of Religion , 60 (3), 249-273.
Stoeckl, K. (2011). DEFINING THE POSTSECULAR. Document Collection of the Italian-Russian Workshop "Politics, Religion and Culture in Postsecular Society. Faenza Italy: PECOB - Portal of East Central and Balkan Europe www.pecob.eu.
Tschannen, O. (1991). The Secularization Paradigm: A Systematization. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion , 30 (4), 395-415.
Václavík, D., Hamplová, D., & Nešpor, Z. R. (2018). Religious Situation in Contemporary Czech Society. CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY RELIGION ,2, 99-122.
بلال موقاي. .(2014). سؤال الدين في الفضاء العمومي "قراءة في تصور هابرماس للمسألة الدينية". مجلة المواقف للبحوث والدراسات في المجتمع والتاريخ ، 9، 55-75.
رفيق عبد السلام (2015). أراء جديدة في العلمانية والدين والديمقراطية (الإصدار 4) بيروت، لبنان: مركز صناعة الفكر للدراسات والأبحاث عبد القادر بوعرفة. (2015). العرب وسؤال ما بعد العلمانية. تأليف جماعي، العلمانية الإشكاليات التاريخية والآفاق المعرفية في أعضال المفهوم وانفتاحه الصفحات (193-222) الجزائر، الجزائر: ابن النديم للنشر والتوزيع.
·