Revisiting Critical Concerns in Discourse Analysis: Towards the Advancement of Discourse Studies in Algeria
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper examines two crucial advancements in discourse analysis: disciplinary specialization and transdisciplinary integration. Both initiatives have contributed to the emergence of Discourse Studies as a distinct field of inquiry. Although Discourse Analysis has been a recognized field since the 1970s, mostly in France and the United Kingdom, Discourse Studies remains an evolving and often ambiguous subject, especially in Algeria. This study employs a theoretical framework to examine the progression of Discourse Studies. This inquiry primarily focuses on how interdisciplinary methods might address the social, political, and epistemological dimensions of speech. This study aims to promote a more critical and thorough approach to discourse analysis within a multidisciplinary framework, connecting the language sciences, social sciences, and humanities. This is achieved via a rigorous analysis of the theoretical frameworks established by poststructuralist theorists like Foucault and Pêcheux, with the integration of findings from contemporary studies. The theoretical framework enables the examination of discourse via many disciplinary lenses, while assessing the current state of discourse studies in Algeria.
Article Details
Copyright Notice
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal[cite: 2, 11].
The journal allows authors to deposit the Version of Record (published version) in an institutional or other repository of their choice without any embargo period.
References
Angermuller, J., Maingueneau, D., & Wodak, R. (2014). Main Currents in Theory and Analysis: An Anthology on Discourse Studies. John Benjamins Publishing.
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Derrida, J. (1976). Of Grammatology. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Social discourse transformation and change. In Political Journalism.
Foucault, M. (1969). The Archaeology of Knowledge. Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1972). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. Pantheon Books.
Gee, J. P. (2011). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. Routledge.
KhosraviNik, M. (2017). Social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS). International Journal of Communication, 11, 1163-1187.
Mair, C. (2016). Sociolinguistic approaches to multilingualism in postcolonial contexts. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13, 230-245.
Pêcheux, M. (1969). Automatic Discourse Analysis. Dunod.
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2016). The discourse-historical approach: The development of identities through language in political contexts. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd ed., pp. 23-61). Sage.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Analyzing discourse within its social context. Cambridge University Press.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2016). Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd ed.). Sage.