Libraries and the Intersection of Power and Knowledge An Analytical Study of the Social Control Function from Michel Foucault's Perspective

Main Article Content

Noureddine Saddar

Abstract

 Libraries are typically viewed as neutral spaces that facilitate free access to knowledge for all, but this perception overlooks the latent authoritative role they play in society. Drawing on Michel Foucault's theory of the intersection of power and knowledge, the article demonstrates how libraries function as mediators of empowerment and tools for social control. Through their classification systems, collection development policies, and access controls, libraries shape what is considered legitimate knowledge while marginalizing or excluding other forms of knowledge. The article explores how libraries contribute to shaping behavior, directing thought, and reproducing dominant knowledge systems. It concludes that, despite their status as cultural institutions, libraries play central roles in regulating the social domain within power structures, and proposes strategies for rethinking library practices to enhance epistemic justice, promote the right to access information, and resist invisible forms of institutional control.

Article Details

How to Cite
Saddar , N. (2026). Libraries and the Intersection of Power and Knowledge. Social and Human Science Studies, 15(1), 679 - 694. https://doi.org/10.46315/1714-015-001-047
Section
Articles

References

1- Amelia N. Gibson, R. L. (2017, November 20). Libraries on the frontlines: neutrality and social justice. (E. P. Limited, Éd.) Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 751-766.
2- Charles C. Lemert, G. G. (2019). Michel Foucault. Social Theory and Transgression. Columbia: Columbia University Press.
3- De Masha Garibyan, J. P. (2014). Access and Identity Management for Libraries: Controlling Access to Online. London: Facet publishing.
4- Doyle, T. (2002). Selection Versus Censorship in Libraries. collection management, 27(1), 15-25.
5- Elkins, E. (2015, May 1). dissertation of Doctorat in philosophy. Regional Lockout:Geographic Restrictions, Digital Entertainment Platforms, and Global Cultural Difference. University of WISCONSIN-MADISON.
6- Foukault, M. (1995). Dicipline. Dans J. Faubian, Rethinking The Subject: An Anthology Of Contemporary European Social Thought (p. 10). Routledge.
7- Foukault, M. (2008). Power/Knowledge. In E. C. Steven Seidman (Ed.), The New Social Theory Reader (2nd Edition ed., p. 7). Routledge.
8- Fox, V. (2019, November 7). Why are the 200s so heavily focused on Christianity? An explainer. Consulté le Juiliet 3, 2025, sur The Dewey blog: https://ddc.typepad.com/025431/2019/11/why-are-the-200s-so-heavily-focused-on-christianity-an-explainer.html
9- GUÉDON, J. C. (1977). Michel Foukault: The Knowledge of Power and The Power of Knowledge. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 245-277.
10- Haroon Idrees, K. M. (2009). Devising a Classification Scheme for Islam: Opinions of LIS andIslamic Studies Scholars. Library Philosophy and Practice , 1-15.
11- Helberger, N. (2005). Controlling Access to Content. Kluwer Law International.
12- Highby, W. (2004). The ethics of academic collection development in a politically contentious era. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 28(4), 465-472.
13- Katie Warburton, C. K. (2024, 8). Quantifying Bias inHierarchical Category Systems. Open Mind, 102-130.
14- Mcmenemy, D. (2008, May). Selection and censorship: Librarians and their collections. Library Review, 341-344.
15- Miller, M. L. (1981, January 1). Children's Access to Library Systems. The Library Quarterly, 51(1), 1-15.
16- Morrisey, L. J. (2008). Ethical Issues in Collection Development. Journal of Library Administration, 47(3-4), 163-171.
17- OLSON, H. A. (1998). Mapping Beyond Dewey’s Boundaries:Constructing ClassificatorySpace for’Marginalized Knowledge Domains. LIBRARY TRENDS, 233-254.
18- Quinn, B. (2012, July). Collection Devlopment and The Psychology of Bias. The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy, 82(3), 277-304.
19- Ronald Deibert, J. P. (2010). Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in Cyberspace. London, England: The MIT PressLondon, England.
20- Stoddart, M. C. (2007). Ideology, Hegemony, Discourse: A Critical Review of Theories of Knowledge and Power. Social Thought & Research, 28, 191-225.
21- Tracey, A., & Ninkov, A. B. (2025, May). Cycles of Bias: Soft Censorship in Libraries. Proceedings of the AnnualConference of CAIS.
22- Tudor, A., Moore, J., & Byrne, S. (2023). Censorship or Self-Censorship in Acquisitions in libraries. School Libraries Worldwide , 1-17.
23- Warburton, Katie, K., Charles, X., Yang, F., & Lea. (2023). Quantifying Bias in Library Classification Systems. (eScholarship, Ed.) Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 45, pp. 2654-2660.