Integrating AI Literacy and Critical Discourse Analysis into the 21st-Century University Curriculum
Main Article Content
Abstract
The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into academia and industry necessitates a fundamental transformation of higher education curricula. Moving beyond purely technical proficiency, this paper proposes a comprehensive framework for embedding AI Literacy and Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) as transdisciplinary core competencies, positioning AI outputs not as neutral tools but as ideologically laden discourse requiring rigorous scrutiny. Drawing on a qualitative multiple-case study involving undergraduate Communication (n=45) and Business (n=38) courses at a Zambian university, this research demonstrates how a pedagogy synergistically combining CDA with hands-on AI interaction fosters deeper digital citizenship, enhances critical thinking, and improves employability skills. Over a three-week intervention, students applied Fairclough’s three-dimensional CDA model to AI-generated press releases and marketing content. The findings reveal three transformative outcomes: first, students adeptly identified embedded societal biases such as gendered leadership stereotypes; second, they reconceptualised AI from an authoritative “oracle” into a fallible, dialogic partner requiring ongoing interrogation; and third, they developed sophisticated, ethically-informed prompting strategies that directly corrected identified biases, a synergistic loop between critique and creation. This approach ensures graduates emerge as critical, innovative, and ethical producers rather than passive consumers of technology. The paper recommends curriculum design, including transdisciplinary modules, faculty development, open-access resources, and reformed assessment strategies that reward critical engagement over mere output generation.
Article Details
References
[2] Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 610-623). Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).
[3] Bozkurt, A. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence (AI) powering personalized learning and the future of education. Open Praxis, 15(1), 1-7.
[4] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597.
[5] Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.
[6] Kumar, R. (2024). Gendering the machine: A critical discourse analysis of gender representation in ChatGPT. New Media & Society, 26(1), 45-67.
[7] Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-16). Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).
[8] Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2023). AI literacy for all: A multi-dimensional model for teaching and learning. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100165.
[9] Siame, P., Chisenga, R.P.A., Kangwa, K.N., Kapau, M.H. & Amoakohene, B. (2025). Constructing legitimacy through language: A critical discourse analysis of Zambian Parliamentary debates. IKR Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences (IKRJAHSS), 1(4), 232-243.
https://ikrpublishers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/IKRJAHSS34183-2025.pdf
[10] Siame, P., & Banda, F. (2024). A Common orthography and short grammar of the Lungu, Mambwe, and Namwanga languages. University of the Western Cape/Centre for Advanced Studies of African Society.
[11] Smith, J., & Jones, A. (2024). The neoliberal algorithm: A CDA of AI-generated business strategy. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 38(2), 145-170.
[12] Spante, M., Hashemi, S. S., Lundin, M., & Algers, A. (2018). Digital competence and digital literacy in higher education research: Systematic review of concept use. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1519143.
[13] Stommel, J. (2020). Critical digital pedagogy: A collection. Hybrid Pedagogy Inc.
[14] Thompson, G., Bowcher, W. L., Fontaine, L., & Schönthal, D. (2019). SFL and critical discourse analysis. In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 342-364). Cambridge University Press.
[15] UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization.
[16] Van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (2nd ed., pp. 466-485). John Wiley & Sons.
[17] Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
[18] World Economic Forum. (2023). Future of Jobs Report 2023. World Economic Forum.
[19] Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
[20] Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39.