Fostering Students’ Readiness for English-Medium Instruction (EMI) Through the Development of Listening Strategies
Main Article Content
Abstract
Many countries have adopted English as a medium of instruction in higher education, and in 2022 the Algerian government initiated a similar policy shift. For such a policy to succeed, university students must possess adequate English proficiency. Listening is central to both language use and knowledge acquisition, since in EMI contexts learners rely on listening ability to understand disciplinary content delivered in lectures. However, many EFL students struggle to develop the level of English listening competence required to benefit fully from EMI instruction. Listening strategies may either facilitate or hinder learning in EMI courses, depending on how effectively they are deployed. Given the scarcity of research on this issue in Algeria, the present study investigates the listening strategies used by students in the English Department at Blida 2 University, Algeria. In Algerian English departments, content courses such as linguistics and civilisation are taught in English and represent 50% of BA credits and 100% of MA credits. This context therefore provides an appropriate setting for examining listening in English-medium content instruction. Strategy use was analysed in relation to participants’ gender, English proficiency, and educational background. Understanding students’ strategic behaviour may help make EFL listening strategy instruction in Algerian English departments more conducive to academic achievement in content courses. Data were collected through three instruments: a listening comprehension test, a listening strategy-use questionnaire, and listening course syllabi. The instruments were reviewed for content validity by an expert and designed with reference to the relevant literature. The questionnaire was completed by eighty-one (81) randomly selected students, and the data were analysed qualitatively and quantitatively. As an exploratory study, the findings are not intended for broad generalisation but should be viewed as initial insights. The main findings indicate apparent similarity in strategy use across the variables examined, suggest that appropriate strategy use may matter more than frequency of use, point to limited learner engagement, and reveal insufficient training in listening strategies. Recommendations are offered to improve listening strategy instruction in Algerian English departments and to support students in developing more effective listening strategies for learning from English-medium lectures.
Article Details
References
Belhiah, H., & Elhami, M. (2015). English as a medium of instruction in the Gulf: When students and teachers speak. Language Policy, 14(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-014-9336-9
Bozorgian, H., & Pillay, H. (2013). Enhancing foreign language learning through listening strategy delivered in L1: An experimental study. International Journal of Instruction, 6(1), 105–122. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/59727
Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 14–26. https://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/docroot/v1n12004/chamot.pdf
Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190505000061
Coskun, A. (2010). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on the listening performance of beginner students. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 4(1), 35–50. https://novitasroyal.org/volume-4-issue-1-april-2010/
Cross, J. (2009). Effects of listening strategy instruction on news videotext comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 13(2), 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168809103446
Ehrman, M., & Oxford, R. (1990). Adult language learning styles and strategies in an intensive training setting. The Modern Language Journal, 74(3), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1990.tb01069.x
Evans, V., & Milton, J. (2002). Listening tests for the revised version of Cambridge FCE: Examination 1. Express Publishing.
Gao, X. (2010). Strategic language learning: The roles of agency and context. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692450
Graham, S. (2017). Research into practice: Listening strategies in an instructed classroom setting. Language Teaching, 50(1), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000306
Graham, S., Santos, D., & Vanderplank, R. (2008). Listening comprehension and strategy use: A longitudinal exploration. System, 36(1), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.11.001
Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587625
Griffiths, C. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31(3), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00048-4
Griffiths, C. (Ed.). (2008). Lessons from good language learners. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497667
Griffiths, C., & Cansiz, G. (2015). Language learning strategies: An holistic view. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 5(3), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2015.5.3.7
Habók, A., & Magyar, A. (2018). The effect of language learning strategies on proficiency, attitudes and school achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 2358. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02358
Heath, R., Sahan, K., Wei, M., Aizawa, I., Zhou, S., & Shepard, C. (2026). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education: An update of Macaro et al. (2018). System, 136, Article 103892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103892
Huang, L., & Wang, Y. (2026). Exploring the contribution of topic familiarity and listening strategies to listening comprehension among L2 learners of English. BMC Psychology, 14, Article 373. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04000-y
Jiang, X., & Smith, R. (2009). Chinese learners’ strategy use in historical perspective: A cross-generational interview-based study. System, 37(2), 286–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.11.005
Karabay, A., & Durrani, N. (2024). The evolution of English medium instruction research in higher education: A bibliometric study. Education Sciences, 14(9), Article 982. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090982
Litovchenko, V. I., & Shmeleva, Z. N. (2020). Investigation of English as a medium of instruction as a pedagogical technology in university educational activities. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1691(1), Article 012194. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1691/1/012194
Marcjanik, M. (2023). EMI in higher education: Current challenges. Anglica: An International Journal of English Studies, 32(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.7311/0860-5734.32.2.07
Meiyan, L., & Lihua, P. (2024). Exploring challenges in academic language-related skills of EFL learners in Chinese EMI settings. Acta Psychologica, 247, Article 104309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104309
Missoum, M. (2007). An investigation of the lecture comprehension and note-taking strategies of second year students of English at the University of Blida [Master's thesis, University of Algiers at Bouzaréah].
Nakatani, Y. (2006). Developing an oral communication strategy inventory. The Modern Language Journal, 90(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00390.x
Nunan, D. (1997). Strategy training in the language classroom: An empirical investigation. RELC Journal, 28(2), 56–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829702800204
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Heinle & Heinle.
Oxford, R. L. (1996). Employing a questionnaire to assess the use of language learning strategies. Applied Language Learning, 7(1–2), 25–45. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu
Oxford, R. L., & Burry-Stock, J. A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL). System, 23(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(94)00047-A
Pawlak, M. (2021). Investigating language learning strategies: Prospects, pitfalls and challenges. Language Teaching Research, 25(5), 817–835. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819876156
Rubin, J. (1975). What the "good language learner" can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586011
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Pearson.
Solak, E., & Cakir, R. (2015). Language learning strategies of language e-learners in Turkey. E-learning and Digital Media, 12(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753014558384
Thomas, N., Bowen, N., & Rose, H. (2021). A diachronic analysis of explicit definitions and implicit conceptualizations of language learning strategies. System, 103, Article 102619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102619
Vandergrift, L. (2004). Listening to learn or learning to listen? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190504000017
Vu, N. T. T., & Burns, A. (2014). English as a medium of instruction: Challenges for Vietnamese tertiary lecturers. Journal of Asia TEFL, 11(3), 1–31.
Zhou, S., & Heath, R. (2025). A longitudinal study on lecture listening difficulties and self-regulated learning strategies across different proficiency levels in EMI higher education. Applied Linguistics Review, 16(1), 509–535. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2023-0113
Zhou, S., & Rose, H. (2021). Self-regulated listening of students at transition from high school to an English medium instruction (EMI) transnational university in China. System, 103, Article 102644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102644
Zhou, S., & Thompson, G. (2023). Exploring the role of English proficiency, self-efficacy, and motivation in listening for learners transitioning to an English-medium transnational university in China. System, 113, Article 102998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.102998
Zumor, A., & Qasem, A. (2019). Challenges of using EMI in teaching and learning of university scientific disciplines: Student voice. International Journal of Language Education, 3(1), 74–90. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v1i1.7510